From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Does PostgreSQL provide anything comparable with MySQL Cluster? |
Date: | 2004-10-18 17:08:43 |
Message-ID: | 20041018170843.GA27831@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 08:58:32PM +0200, nd02tsk(at)student(dot)hig(dot)se wrote:
> Hello
>
> Does PostgreSQL provide anything comparable with the functionality of
> MySQL Cluster?
>
> I appreciate all information.
No, in two ways:
1. There is not currently any in-transaction cross-machine
replication system which anyone in the community is ready to call
"production grade".
2. No replication system that anyone in the community would call
"production grade" would permit a COMMIT of a transaction to work for
some tables in the set, and not for others.
MySQL appears to beat us on both fronts. Whether such a system is
useful to you is another matter.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
This work was visionary and imaginative, and goes to show that visionary
and imaginative work need not end up well.
--Dennis Ritchie
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hervé Piedvache | 2004-10-18 17:14:13 | Re: French paper |
Previous Message | Masse Jacques | 2004-10-18 16:58:32 | French paper |