| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ... |
| Date: | 2004-10-18 21:00:45 |
| Message-ID: | 200410181400.45005.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Simon,
> I agree that you could test this by running on a bigger or smaller server,
> i.e. one with more or less RAM. Running on a faster/slower server at the
> same time might alter the results and confuse the situation.
Unfortunately, a faster server is the only option I have that also has more
RAM. If I double the RAM and double the processors at the same time, what
would you expect to happen to the shared_buffers curve?
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-18 21:01:25 | Re: Getting rid of AtEOXact Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: [PERFORM] First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...) |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-10-18 20:36:19 | Re: Getting rid of AtEOXact Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-18 21:01:25 | Re: Getting rid of AtEOXact Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] Re: [PERFORM] First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ...) |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-10-18 20:36:19 | Re: Getting rid of AtEOXact Buffers (was Re: [Testperf-general] |