| From: | Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>, Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: mmap (was First set of OSDL Shared Mem scalability results, some wierdness ... |
| Date: | 2004-10-15 21:56:30 |
| Message-ID: | 20041015145630.A21918@osdl.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 05:37:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Wong <markw(at)osdl(dot)org> writes:
> > I know where the do_sigaction is coming from in this particular case.
> > Manfred Spraul tracked it to a pair of pgsignal calls in libpq.
> > Commenting out those two calls out virtually eliminates do_sigaction from
> > the kernel profile for this workload.
>
> Hmm, I suppose those are the ones associated with suppressing SIGPIPE
> during send(). It looks to me like those should go away in 8.0 if you
> have compiled with ENABLE_THREAD_SAFETY ... exactly how is PG being
> built in the current round of tests?
>
Ah, yes. Ok. It's not being configured with any options. That'll be easy to
rememdy though. I'll get that change made and we can try again.
Mark
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Wong | 2004-10-15 22:10:22 | Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ... |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-15 21:44:34 | Re: [Testperf-general] Re: First set of OSDL Shared Memscalability results, some wierdness ... |