From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Troels Arvin <troels(at)arvin(dot)dk>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Some developer FAQ links need updating |
Date: | 2004-10-15 16:19:46 |
Message-ID: | 200410150919.46546.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Peter, Folks:
> Since we have limited resources, I think it's OK that we concentrate on
> working with the latest official standards version. And because the latest
> standards version is modularized and has individual feature lists and
> packages, it would be a lot easier for us to look good, and it would be
> more useful for users to, say, specify a workable set of requirements for
> their applications.
FWIW, there's two standards that application developers are concerned with as
far as I can tell: SQL92, which is the "stable" standard that ensures
cross-database compatibility (as well as the only standard that is readable)
and SQL2003, which is the current standard and ensures buzzowrd-compliance as
well as future prospects.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-15 16:51:04 | Re: Some developer FAQ links need updating |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-10-15 16:10:11 | Re: Some developer FAQ links need updating |