From: | elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SQL 2003 conformance |
Date: | 2004-10-14 00:29:02 |
Message-ID: | 20041013172902.H14574@cookie.varlena.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
I have a couple of the new features written up, but nothing
like an entire review. If someone can tackle this job
and wants help, I'll help (but I cannot sign up for the
whole thing). Or if someone wants the material
on the items I have done, just email me.
--elein
elein(at)varlena(dot)com
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 07:52:24PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Is anyone feeling masochistic and wants to review the SQL standards
> conformance chapter in the documentation for SQL 2003? I know that
> several features were added or revised for SQL 2003 conformance, so it
> would be nice to have that documented for the 8.0 release.
>
> I think an overview of how the structure of SQL 2003 differs from SQL
> 1999 would also help the group to analyse the individual feature groups
> more quickly.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut
> http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-10-14 07:14:13 | Re: SQL 2003 conformance |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-10-12 17:52:24 | SQL 2003 conformance |