Re: Movement of FAQ's

Dave Page wrote:
> > Oh, no I didn't. Would you like to make adjustments to it
> > and/or FAQ_MINGW so they point to each other and don't
> > duplicate information?
>
> I'm not entirely convinced that's the right answer. The main concern is
> making things easy for the users - that's what I've tried to do with the
> installer faq (which I now notice Magnus has been editting!) by covering
> both installer specific stuff, and non-installer specific; a kindof 1
> stop shop for all Win32 faqs. I appreciate that we don't necessarily
> want the installer stuff in the main tree however. What about making the
> version in the tree a subset of our one, simply covering the
> mingw/compiliation issues which I can include in one standalone section
> in our faq?

Both FAQ's are going to change over time, I am sure. I see no problem
in giving them a web link to the FAQ_MINGW for compilation issues.
Having the Mingw outside our CVS doesn't make sense to me.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073