| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Martín Marqués <martin(at)bugs(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Cornelia Boenigk" <poppcorn(at)cornelia-boenigk(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL classification |
| Date: | 2004-10-09 20:59:26 |
| Message-ID: | 200410091359.26405.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Cornelia,
> > > A German company wants (maybe) migrate to PostgreSQL and asked:
> > > - is PostgreSQL classified? Does it have a ECCN (for example 5D002,
> > > 5D992, etc.)??
> > > - is PostgreSQL considered as EAR99 product
> > > - are there any export restrictions for PostgreSQL?
They e-mailed me as well. I told them that
a) I had no reason to believe that PostgreSQL was considered a "US Product",
and
b) that they needed to talk to an attorney.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Armen Rizal | 2004-10-11 09:05:39 | Reusable pl/pgsql samples ? |
| Previous Message | Martín Marqués | 2004-10-09 13:09:59 | Re: PostgreSQL classification |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | elein | 2004-10-10 02:52:21 | Re: Forum.postgresql.org |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-10-09 18:30:26 | Re: archives.postgresql.org |