| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jimmie H(dot) Apsey" <japsey(at)futuredental(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: LOST REFERENTIAL INTEGRITY |
| Date: | 2004-10-04 21:42:01 |
| Message-ID: | 20041004214200.GF24018@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 05:25:59PM -0400, Jimmie H. Apsey wrote:
> I have kept up-to-date our Red Hat kernels as you can probably see from
> the Linux 2.4.9-e.49smp kernel. Am I required to maintain my own
> version of Postgres alongside and compiled into Red Hat's latest and
> greatest kernel? If that's true, WHEW! I wonder what version of
> Postgres is installed in Red Hat's latest kernel of AS 3.0?
The version of your kernel and the version of postgres are completely
unrelated, you can upgrade either whenever you like independant of the
other. The only thing you may need to look into is the version of libc
and other such libraries.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2004-10-04 21:53:36 | Re: Cursors and JDBC |
| Previous Message | Taber, Mark | 2004-10-04 21:40:13 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 install woes |