From: | Antonios Christofides <anthony(at)itia(dot)ntua(dot)gr> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Is Win32 port good for operational use? |
Date: | 2004-10-04 10:19:14 |
Message-ID: | 20041004101914.GA2761@itia.ntua.gr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
I know we will be using at our own risk, I have read the
"experimental" warnings, but still PostgreSQL is a very attractive
RDBMS for the Windows application we are developing. Most customers
will want a simple single-machine version, where the program will be
storing its data in a local database without the user knowing much
about it. Some customers will want a central database and will
probably be given the option to choose between PostgreSQL and Oracle.
The problem is to choose the RDBMS for the single-machine, single-user
version.
What if we have crashes or other critical bugs? Should we expect
reasonable support from the developers in such cases? Is the number
of Win32 developers decent? I mean, the Win32 project is not, I hope,
supported by one or two key people and would go down if they decided
to become sailors instead? :-)
Needless to say, the developers will have all kind of help from us in
tracking down important bugs, even access to our machines if
necessary.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | CoL | 2004-10-04 11:58:08 | Re: SELECT from a set of values really slow? |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2004-10-04 08:03:14 | Re: Random not so random |