From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Chris Ryan <xgbe(at)yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Server unreliability |
Date: | 2004-10-02 20:08:40 |
Message-ID: | 20041002170759.Y64687@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Chris? Some extra error checking needed, maybe?
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004, Gavin Sherry wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>
>>> about pg_query not getting a good connection or similar problems.
>>> Isn't normal advice to check return codes before even trying to use the
>>> connections? Why isn't this done in the main postgresql.org code, where
>>> anyone can see it, is beyond me. Of course the solution to the
>>> underlying problem is to restart the Postgres server, but why should we
>>> inform the user that Postgres' own database server is down, in the worst
>>> possible way?
>>
>> Just curious here, but when/where? We haven't had a database issue in
>> quite awhile that *I'm* aware of ... in fact, the whole web site is
>> static, generated periodically from .php files, so that the mirrors can
>> pick things up properly, so there should never be a 'cannot connect to
>> database' issue, since there are no connections to the database being made
>
> I know this isn't on the main site but:
>
> http://www.alcove.com.au/~swm/gborg.png
>
> Gavin
>
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ewald Geschwinde | 2004-10-04 10:29:18 | Re: Presenting PostgreSQLFr.org and its future |
Previous Message | Gavin Sherry | 2004-10-02 13:34:06 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Server unreliability |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2004-10-02 20:24:12 | Re: Problem with mirrorring |
Previous Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2004-10-02 19:59:46 | Re: Problem with mirrorring |