From: | Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Repeated VACUUM reports same number of deleted rows |
Date: | 2004-10-02 00:22:17 |
Message-ID: | 200410021022.18207.mr-russ@pws.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 12:42 am, Tom Lane wrote:
> Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > Should VACUUM report the rows as deleted or say they could not be deleted?
> > Why does it report the same information for three runs in a row?
>
> I see no pending deletions in that vacuum output:
>
> > DETAIL: 0 dead row versions cannot be removed yet.
>
INFO: vacuuming "filter.access_log_big"
INFO: index "access_log_url" now contains 5159204 row versions in 74984 pages
DETAIL: 21455 index pages have been deleted, 20000 are currently reusable.
I expect that index info not to be the same each vacuum run. Why are 21455 index pages deleted
on runs 1, 2 and 3.
> so I'm not sure why you would expect the output to change.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2004-10-02 08:49:01 | Re: ODBC for PostgreSQL 7.4 |
Previous Message | Astha Raj | 2004-10-01 23:24:41 | ODBC for PostgreSQL 7.4 |