| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Karel Zak <zakkr(at)zf(dot)jcu(dot)cz>, Manfred Spraul <manfred(at)colorfullife(dot)com>, mcolosimo(at)smtp-bedford(dot)mitre(dot)org, Marc Colosimo <mcolosimo(at)mitre(dot)org>, List pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: tweaking MemSet() performance - 7.4.5 |
| Date: | 2004-10-01 20:40:03 |
| Message-ID: | 200410012240.03342.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> MemSet was written when gcc 2.X wasn't even stable yet. Have you run
> any tests on 3.4 to see if MemSet is still a win with that compiler?
I've done a test years ago that showed that memset is usually at least
as good as MemSet:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2002-10/msg00085.php
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-01 21:04:50 | Re: pg_stat_activity EXISTS bug in 8.0.0beta3 |
| Previous Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2004-10-01 19:34:38 | ERROR: left link changed unexpectedly |