| From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | "D(dot) Duccini" <duccini(at)backpack(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org, Pgsql-novice <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: date_trunc'd timestamp index possible? |
| Date: | 2004-10-01 18:44:37 |
| Message-ID: | 20041001184437.GA21599@wolff.to |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-novice pgsql-sql |
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 13:28:30 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> wrote:
>
> I am not sure how to check if the supplied function for converting
> a timestamp with time zone to a timestamp without timezone using a
> specified time zone is immutable. I think this function should be
> immutable, but that it probably isn't.
I found that most of the various timezone functions are marked as stable
instead of immutable. I think at least a couple of these should be
marked as immutable and I will try reporting this as a bug.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2004-10-01 18:47:46 | Handling of mutable functions in subqueries? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-01 18:33:47 | Re: Vacuum writes on empty system |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-01 18:49:34 | Re: [SQL] date_trunc'd timestamp index possible? |
| Previous Message | D. Duccini | 2004-10-01 18:28:47 | Re: date_trunc'd timestamp index possible? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-01 18:49:34 | Re: [SQL] date_trunc'd timestamp index possible? |
| Previous Message | D. Duccini | 2004-10-01 18:28:47 | Re: date_trunc'd timestamp index possible? |