| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
| Cc: | John Hansen <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: archives.postgresql.org |
| Date: | 2004-09-30 14:24:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20040930112305.N3407@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, John Hansen wrote:
>>
>>> Guys,
>>>
>>> Now that archives has moved to commandprompt and changed layout, can we
>>> please get the last-modified issue fixed, before I start the recrawl?
>>
>> What's wrong with the last-modified date? I checked it the other day, and
>> it looked fine to me ...
>
> you use <meta tag> for last-modified date, but crawlers does prefer more
> standard way via http headers, as you once did using 'touch' hack
> (what's wrong with it ?)
To be honest, I want to figure out how to do it off of Message Date
properly, instead of time stamp of the file ... that way, if we have to
regenerate, all the 'last-modified' do stay the same ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2004-09-30 15:03:56 | Re: archives.postgresql.org |
| Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2004-09-30 14:17:59 | Re: archives.postgresql.org |