From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Server unreliability |
Date: | 2004-09-29 19:16:30 |
Message-ID: | 200409291216.30653.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Marc,
> I *believe* that this was one of hte reasons we looked at Bricolage awhile
> back, no?
Well, no. Bricolage was (and is) considered just for Techdocs. The holdup
there was:
1) getting a Mason expert volunteer to do the template design (we've had one
offer), and
2) waiting for the new www.postgresql.org design to be completed to integrate
with.
However, Bric was not considered for the main site. For more details, read
the archives of the WWW list.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-09-29 19:23:47 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Server unreliability |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-09-29 19:14:05 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Server unreliability |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-09-29 19:23:47 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Server unreliability |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-09-29 19:14:05 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Server unreliability |