From: | "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime() |
Date: | 2004-09-20 23:54:58 |
Message-ID: | 200409201754.58119.pgsql@bluepolka.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Monday September 20 2004 5:45, Ed L. wrote:
> On Monday September 20 2004 5:39, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Ed L." <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net> writes:
> > > + /*
> > > + * We expect a strftime(%z) result of the form "[+-]HHMM"
> > > according to + * RFC822-conformant dates, where HH:MM is the
> > > unsigned UTC offset. + * If we don't get it, just return zero
> > > offset, and let the logs + * rotate on UTC time boundaries.
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > + count = strftime(msg, 6, "%z", localtime(&now));
> >
> > That might work for you, but it's not portable.
Do you consider pg_tm.tm_gmtoff reliable and portable from
pg_localtime(&now)?
Ed
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-09-21 00:02:55 | Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime() |
Previous Message | Ed L. | 2004-09-20 23:45:01 | Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime() |