From: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)oryx(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0 |
Date: | 2004-09-20 15:23:37 |
Message-ID: | 20040920152337.GA29324@penne.toroid.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
At 2004-09-20 11:02:50 -0400, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us wrote:
>
> (1) What about preparing an unnamed statement ...
stmtName == "" will work.
> (2) What about discovering the actually resolved parameter types?
I'm not sure what to do about that.
I could extend PGresult to hold ParameterDescription information, then
provide accessor functions à la PQnfields/PQfformat. But that would be
a fairly intrusive change. And I shudder to even think about trying to
reuse the existing PGresult fields/accessors to do the job.
Do you have any suggestions?
-- ams
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Wheeler | 2004-09-20 16:35:00 | Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-09-20 15:02:50 | Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Wheeler | 2004-09-20 16:35:00 | Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0 |
Previous Message | T E Schmitz | 2004-09-20 15:14:46 | COUNT(*) to find records which have a certain number of dependencies ? |