Re: Others applying patch queue patches

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Others applying patch queue patches
Date: 2004-09-17 14:26:18
Message-ID: 200409171426.i8HEQIF28618@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Neil Conway wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2004-09-16 at 23:24, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>> It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
> >>> and approves it.
> >>
> >> does this reflect a change in the patch application procedures?
>
> In my mind this is just a clearer statement of what the policy always
> was ;-). The patch review/application load was never supposed to fall
> entirely on Bruce. The list he maintains is just there to ensure that
> nothing slips through the cracks.

Yes, I welcome others to apply patches from the queue --- in fact I
encourage it. I think we need one person making sure no patches are
lost (that role doesn't distribute well) but we don't need to have one
person applying patches from that queue.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-09-17 14:36:41 Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0
Previous Message Dave Page 2004-09-17 13:56:09 Re: libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0