Re: A generic question: Schema without foreign key specification?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Kumar S <ps_postgres(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A generic question: Schema without foreign key specification?
Date: 2004-09-16 22:28:10
Message-ID: 200409161528.10815.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

Kumar,

> While designing 3-4 different schemas for my
> database, a question has been chasing me. I am not a
> CS graduate and I was never taught the nitty gritty's
> of Dabase schema or rules.

Me neither. I learned the hard way, on the job.

> My question is - a schema that has no foreign key
> defined (except in 1 or 2 instances), will it be
> considered a good schema or bad schema by experts.

Bad, unless there's only 2 or 3 tables for your 1 or 2 joins.

> Imagine a scenario where most of the relations are
> defined by linker tables(relationship table) that is
> formed by two different primary keys from two
> different tables are defined to avoid foreign key
> relationships. creating a database in this kind of
> scenario, can it be considered a good database design.

But in that case you should have FKs from the linker tables.

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Jochum 2004-09-17 09:30:11 Installation problem...
Previous Message Jake Stride 2004-09-16 22:09:51 Re: is there a sql command to display table definition?