Re: WIN1250 as server encoding

From: "Jeroen T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIN1250 as server encoding
Date: 2004-09-15 15:09:50
Message-ID: 20040915150950.GB45364@xs4all.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 05:02:44PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Some people have requested to add WIN1250 as an allowed server encoding.
> So far, the order of the encoding numbers determined which ones were
> client-only, so in order not to renumber the encodings, I could only
> come up with the attached ugly solution. If no one thinks of a better
> one, we'll go with that.

Probably a silly suggestion, but... A second encoding number which happens
to assign the same character codes as WIN1250, with a 1-to-1 translation
table, and renaming the old number to make room for the new one in newly
compiled code?

Jeroen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-09-15 15:19:41 Re: PL/PgSQL "bare" function calls
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-09-15 15:05:48 Re: PL/PgSQL "bare" function calls