From: | Markus Schaber <schabios(at)logi-track(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Performance List <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres -- |
Date: | 2004-09-14 12:14:52 |
Message-ID: | 20040914141452.002e5d4e@kingfisher.intern.logi-track.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi, Mischa,
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 20:47:17 GMT
Mischa Sandberg <ischamay(dot)andbergsay(at)activestateway(dot)com> wrote:
> On the other hand, if you do warehouse-style loading (Insert, or PG
> COPY, into a temp table; and then 'upsert' into the perm table), I can
> guarantee 2500 inserts/sec is no problem.
As we can forsee that we'll have similar insert rates to cope with in
the not-so-far future, what do you mean with 'upsert'? Do you mean a
stored procedure that iterates over the temp table?
Generally, what is the fastest way for doing bulk processing of
update-if-primary-key-matches-and-insert-otherwise operations?
Thanks,
Markus Schaber
--
markus schaber | dipl. informatiker
logi-track ag | rennweg 14-16 | ch 8001 zürich
phone +41-43-888 62 52 | fax +41-43-888 62 53
mailto:schabios(at)logi-track(dot)com | www.logi-track.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Leeuw van der, Tim | 2004-09-14 12:42:20 | Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres -- |
Previous Message | Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud | 2004-09-14 09:07:59 | Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres -- merge tables |