From: | G u i d o B a r o s i o <gbarosio(at)uolsinectis(dot)com(dot)ar> |
---|---|
To: | mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: slower every day |
Date: | 2004-09-01 15:07:39 |
Message-ID: | 20040901150739.BB5206C4E8@honorio.sinectis.com.ar |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Thanks for the reply,
Been reading hackers of Aug 2004 and found the threads. It's a common habit to create two lines on the configuration files, in order to maintain the copy of the default conf file. I guess this should be the worst scenery for a freshly incoming DBA trying to put things in order.
A temporary patch, will be updating documentation, encouraging administrators to use the SHOW ALL; command in the psql env, to confirm that changes where made.
In my case, a 1.2 gig file was written, performance was on the floor. And my previous situation, a reindex force task last saturday, confused me. This is not a trivial problem, but in conjunction with other small problems could become a big one.
Good habits when touching conf files & using the SHOW ALL to confirm that changes where made will help until this is patched.
Thanks for Postgres,
Regards, Guido.
> This issue was resently discussed on hackers. It is a known issue, not very
> convinient for the user. Nevertheless it is not fixed in 8.0, but will
> perhaps be addressed in the next major release.
> (Remembering, it was a non-trivial thing to change.)
>
> Best Regards,
> Michael Paesold
>
> G u i d o B a r o s i o wrote:
>
> > The solution appeared as something I didn't know
> >
> > On the .conf file
> >
> > Previous situation:
> >
> > #log_something=false
> > log_something=true
> >
> > Worst situation
> > #log_something=false
> > #log_something=true
> >
> > Nice situation
> > log_something=false
> > #log_something=true
> >
> >
> > Ok, the problem was that I assumed that commenting a value on
> > the conf file will set it up to a default (false?). I was wrong.
> > My server was writting tons of log's.
> >
> > Is this the normal behavior for pg_ctl reload? It seems that looks for new
> values, remembering the last state on the ones that actually are commented.
> Although it's my fault to have 2 (tow) lines for the same issue, and that I
> should realize that this is MY MISTAKE, the log defaults on a reload, if
> commented, tend to be the last value entered?
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Hoover | 2004-09-01 18:40:15 | Help understanding locale |
Previous Message | Michael Paesold | 2004-09-01 14:28:15 | Re: slower every day |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-09-01 15:33:24 | timezone vs _timezone on Windows |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-09-01 14:59:56 | Re: Forward zeroing of pg_clog |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chester Kustarz | 2004-09-01 15:47:32 | Re: seqscan instead of index scan |
Previous Message | Michael Paesold | 2004-09-01 14:28:15 | Re: slower every day |