From: | G u i d o B a r o s i o <gbarosio(at)uolsinectis(dot)com(dot)ar> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: slower every day |
Date: | 2004-09-01 11:58:53 |
Message-ID: | 20040901115853.309FB6C4F2@honorio.sinectis.com.ar |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Again me,
To make it easier.
Situation A:
log_something = true
Situation B:
# log_something = <anything>
Situation C:
log_something = false
After the pg_ctl reload:
Situation B = Situation A
Situation C <> (Situation A || Situation B)
Is this the expected behavior?
Conclusion:
If you comment a line on the conf file, and reload it, will remain in the last state. (either wast true or false, while I expected a default)
Regards
> The solution appeared as something I didn't know
>
> On the .conf file
>
> Previous situation:
>
> #log_something=false
> log_something=true
>
> Worst situation
> #log_something=false
> #log_something=true
>
> Nice situation
> log_something=false
> #log_something=true
>
>
> Ok, the problem was that I assumed that commenting a value on
> the conf file will set it up to a default (false?). I was wrong.
> My server was writting tons of log's.
>
> Is this the normal behavior for pg_ctl reload? It seems that looks for new values, remembering the last state on the ones that actually are commented. Although it's my fault to have 2 (tow) lines for the same issue, and that I should realize that this is MY MISTAKE, the log defaults on a reload, if commented, tend to be the last value entered?
>
> Regards,
> Guido
>
>
> > Am Mittwoch, 1. September 2004 12:06 schrieb G u i d o B a r o s i o:
> > > The problem is the time that the postgres takes to perform/return a
> > > query. For example, trying the \d <tablename> command takes between 4 or 5
> > > seconds. This table is very big, but I am not asking for the rows, only
> > > asking the table schema, so...why is this so slow?!?!? My last
> > > administrative action into this table was a reindex to all the indexes via
> > > the BKI in standalone mode. I thought I suceed, but this was las saturday.
> >
> > Do you regularly vacuum and analyze the database?
> >
> > --
> > Peter Eisentraut
> > http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2004-09-01 12:27:54 | Re: [ADMIN] slower every day |
Previous Message | Pradeepkumar, Pyatalo (IE10) | 2004-09-01 11:43:08 | Applicationl Crash - Connection reset by peer !!! |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2004-09-01 12:27:54 | Re: [ADMIN] slower every day |
Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-09-01 10:53:58 | Re: open item: tablespace handing in |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2004-09-01 12:27:54 | Re: [ADMIN] slower every day |
Previous Message | G u i d o B a r o s i o | 2004-09-01 10:57:15 | Re: slower every day |