From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com |
Cc: | "Andrew Piskorski" <atp(at)piskorski(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Heikki Linnakangas" <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
Subject: | Re: Contrib -- PostgreSQL shared variables |
Date: | 2004-08-31 01:58:32 |
Message-ID: | 200408302158.32439.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Monday 30 August 2004 09:50, pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 09:24:59AM -0400, pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com wrote:
> > What's the advantage of instead stuffing these in-memory variables
> > into PostgreSQL? That it still works correctly and simply even if you
> > have a farm of 10 separate web servers sitting in front of it? That
> > could be useful for certain applications, but is there any more to it
> > than that?
>
> Isn't "that could be useful for certain applications" enough of a reason
> to add something to contrib?
>
That's enough of a reason to add something to *gborg*, but I can think of a
lot of things I would rather see the postgresql major contributors
maintaining than this.. especially when you consider that we've already
removed things like jdbc from contrib.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Rawnsley | 2004-08-31 01:59:47 | version upgrade |
Previous Message | pgsql | 2004-08-31 01:40:47 | Re: Contrib -- PostgreSQL shared variables |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-31 04:56:49 | Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime() |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-08-30 21:09:57 | Re: [PATCHES] 8.0.0b1: configure.in cygipc |