| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Deadlocks caused by referential integrity checks |
| Date: | 2004-08-26 03:36:43 |
| Message-ID: | 200408260336.i7Q3ah204627@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> > At least some versions of postgres ensure that constraint triggers will be
> > executed in alphabetical order.
>
> Only within a single event, though, so I don't think fooling with the
> trigger names will do anything to resolve the sorts of problems people
> are dealing with.
>
> The most promising quick-fix I've heard suggested is to mark all the FK
> constraints as deferred until end of transaction. That would reduce the
> time window in which the locks are held to a short interval and thus
> make deadlocks less likely (not impossible, certainly, but less likely).
We would probably have to allow the deferred trigger queue to spill to
disk if we do that, of course.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jon Asher | 2004-08-26 04:25:51 | Querying large record sets |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-26 03:25:26 | Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE total runtime != walltime |