Re: Unsupported 3rd-party solutions (Was: Few questions

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unsupported 3rd-party solutions (Was: Few questions
Date: 2004-08-23 21:49:42
Message-ID: 20040823184732.D4215@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, Thomas Hallgren wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Enlarging the core committee by the amount you seem to be thinking of
>> would transform it into something quite different than it is now
>> (in particular it would be too large to make decisions effectively,
>> IMHO).
>>
>>
> I can relate to that. Lean and mean is good. So pehaps the core committee
> should not be enlarged. Instead, another committee should be established for
> this purpose that work closely together with the core committee (perhaps
> cross staffed to some extent).

You are almost there ... now, go that one extra step and you have "a side
project whose goal is to take the core server and bundle it with 3rd party
apps to provide a complete RDBMS solution" ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Wheeler 2004-08-23 22:00:42 Re: UTF-8 and LIKE vs =
Previous Message David Wheeler 2004-08-23 21:47:01 Re: UTF-8 and LIKE vs =