| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: All three packages ... |
| Date: | 2004-08-20 01:34:31 |
| Message-ID: | 200408192134.31552.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday 19 August 2004 16:04, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > Let's go with the updated regression outputs ... probably better then
> > going and reverting down flex/bison just for packaging :(
>
> That's what I thought too. Patches committed --- rewrap whenever you
> have a chance.
>
I may misunderstand the problem, but if the change in bison/flex can break the
regression tests, couldn't it also break peoples apps? That would seem like
a nasty suprise to spring on someone this late in that release cycle...
--
Robert Treat
Build A Better Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-08-20 01:38:34 | Re: All three packages ... |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-20 01:10:30 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.0beta1 and diet libc |