| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: All three packages ... |
| Date: | 2004-08-19 15:17:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20040819121610.D82455@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Nope, and I even checked jdbc to make sure nothing go screwed up with the
moves post-7.3, and its there also ... and 7.2 *appears* to be okay size
wise ...
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> I never got any feedback on v7.3.7's packaging, so I'm guessing that it
>> looked okay to everyone, even though it was substantially smaller?
>
> Devrim pointed out yesterday that it seemed to be missing
> contrib/earthdistance; that's not enough to explain the size diff
> though.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-19 15:19:38 | Re: All three packages ... |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-19 15:02:09 | Re: All three packages ... |