Re: Help specifying new machine

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, William Yu <wyu(at)talisys(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Help specifying new machine
Date: 2004-08-19 16:18:31
Message-ID: 200408190918.31797.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Tom,

> This is really interesting. We had previously seen some evidence that
> the Xeon sucks at running Postgres, but I thought that the issues only
> materialized with multiple CPUs (because what we were concerned about
> was the cost of transferring cache lines across CPUs). AFAICS this test
> is using single CPUs. Maybe there is more going on than we realized.

Aside from the fact that the Xeon architecture is a kludge?

Intel really screwed up the whole Xeon line through some bad architectural
decisions, and instead of starting over from scratch, "patched" the problem.
The result has been sub-optimal Xeon performance for the last two years.

This is why AMD is still alive. Better efficiency, lower cost.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gaetano Mendola 2004-08-19 17:26:01 using an index worst performances
Previous Message Jean-Luc Lachance 2004-08-19 14:22:45 Re: help with query