From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Steve Bergman <steve(at)rueb(dot)com>, "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta? |
Date: | 2004-08-18 15:55:21 |
Message-ID: | 200408181755.21507.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> In the PG case a
> single specfile currently aggregates the core server, jdbc, and
> pygresql ... and I'm getting pressure to include more stuff.
How does that compute, considering that everyone else appears to be
working on including less stuff?
> The init script is a different matter. That in principle could be
> taken from the upstream package. I'm not sure if all the Linux
> distributions could agree on a single init script, though
That can be answered with a plain and simple "no".
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-18 16:10:20 | Re: [HACKERS] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta? |
Previous Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2004-08-18 15:30:05 | Re: [ADMIN] SRPM for 8.0.0 beta? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2004-08-18 16:06:05 | Re: Problem analyzing performance of query |
Previous Message | Marcel Boscher | 2004-08-18 15:42:08 | Installing FullTextSearchTool tsearch2 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-08-18 16:00:06 | Re: 7.4.3 & 8.0.0beta1 + Solaris 9: default pg_hba.conf |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-18 15:46:25 | Re: 7.4.3 & 8.0.0beta1 + Solaris 9: default pg_hba.conf breaks |