From: | Robert Paulsen <robert(at)paulsenonline(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: idle processes |
Date: | 2004-08-15 04:43:39 |
Message-ID: | 200408142343.39360.robert@paulsenonline.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Saturday 14 August 2004 11:17 pm, CSN wrote:
> I'm using regular pg_connect's. The processes
> eventually went away - was just wondering why they'd
> stick around.
>
Well, unless I misunderstand, when a script ends the connection should go away
and I think that means the postgres process supporting it should also go
away. Is it possible your script is not ending or is in some kind of loop?
I asked about persistent connections because I believe they are supposed to
hang around after the script ends and because I noticed the behavior you
mentioned ("extraneous" postgres processes) while experimenting with them.
With regular non-persistent connections I don't see those long-lived
processes.
(Aside from the point of your question, it seems to me persistent are somewhat
useless since you can't close them when you are done with them.)
--
Robert C. Paulsen, Jr.
robert(at)paulsenonline(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2004-08-15 05:51:22 | Re: SRPM for 8.0.0 beta? |
Previous Message | CSN | 2004-08-15 04:17:09 | Re: idle processes |