Re: to_timestamp overloaded to convert from Unix epoch

Sorry, I now see I should add the patch to the 8.1 queue.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> TODO here?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com> writes:
> > > On Aug 15, 2004, at 1:19 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> There was however another patch submitted recently that seemed to
> > >> duplicate yours functionally but used a different syntax --- I think
> >
> > > Other than Chris' suggestion of extract(timestamp from epoch)?
> >
> > [ looks in archives... ] Oh, actually that was *you* --- I was vaguely
> > remembering your proposed patch of 2-Aug. You were calling the function
> > epoch_to_timestamp at the time.
> >
> > I like to_timestamp(double) better than these other names ...
> >
> > regards, tom lane
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
> >
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
> + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073