| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud <lists(at)boutiquenumerique(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] Reiser4 |
| Date: | 2004-08-14 10:57:37 |
| Message-ID: | 200408141257.37201.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud wrote:
> > Is there also a possibility to tell Postgres : "I don't care if I
> > lose 30 seconds of transactions on this table if the power goes
> > out, I just want to be sure it's still ACID et al. compliant but
> > you can fsync less often and thus be faster" (with a possibility of
> > setting that on a per-table basis) ?
Then it would be "ACI" compliant.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-08-14 11:12:20 | 7.4 backpatches |
| Previous Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2004-08-14 10:55:16 | 8.0beta1 hot spare how to |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2004-08-14 14:24:08 | Re: insert |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-08-14 01:39:19 | Re: Replication: Slony-I vs. Mammoth Replicator vs. ? |