| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Tablespace issues (comment on ,moving indexes) |
| Date: | 2004-08-13 02:38:16 |
| Message-ID: | 200408122238.16527.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday 10 August 2004 22:13, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > What I mean here is that I think it would be in our best interests to
> > define the syntax for any new operation to be as easily guessed as
> > possible. I believe that ALTER INDEX would be more easily guessed by
> > more people as the means by which one would alter an index's tablespace
> > than ALTER TABLE, even if those people have a decent amount of PG
> > experience.
>
> I agree. Whether or not it gets done though is the question...
>
But it should be on the TODO imho.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Better Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-08-13 02:47:52 | Re: Tablespace issues (comment on ,moving indexes) |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-08-13 02:26:16 | Re: [PATCHES] Patch for pg_dump: Multiple -t options and |