Re: Why is WIN 1250 client only?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Serguei Mokhov" <mokhov(at)cs(dot)concordia(dot)ca>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why is WIN 1250 client only?
Date: 2004-08-11 09:32:42
Message-ID: 200408111132.42726.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am Mittwoch, 11. August 2004 07:04 schrieb Serguei Mokhov:
> > Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:30:23 +0200
> > From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
> >
> > Why is the encoding WIN 1250 only for the client side? It seems that
> > with the new Windows port, folks will be interested in using it on the
> > server side.
>
> Then what about WIN1251 (Cyrillic)? :) And all the others for that matter?

WIN 1251 is already allowed as server-side encoding, which indicates to me
that this distinction is potentially ill-conceived.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2004-08-11 10:15:14 Re: 8.0 Release notes
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-08-11 09:25:42 Re: Missing French backend translations in the HEAD