From: | James William Pye <flaw(at)rhid(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] casting strings to multidimensional arrays yields |
Date: | 2004-08-11 09:05:16 |
Message-ID: | 20040811090516.GA54147@void.ph.cox.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On 08/06/04:31/5, Joe Conway wrote:
> I just reread your comment and thought about it more. I think most of
> what I said in the last post holds, but in addition part of the problem
> lies in the fact that we don't implement multidimensional arrays as
> nested arrays, but rather as one monolithic structure. If we did the
> former, then 2x0 would be feasible.
>
> Investigating, and possibly implementing, multidimensional arrays as a
> nested structure is another item on my wish list. I'm still not entirely
> sure how difficult or desirable it is, but my interpretation of SQL99 is
> that nested arrays is the requirement.
+1
This would probably make MD array support in plpy almost trivial, so it is
definitely desirable to me.
--
Regards,
James William Pye
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Round | 2004-08-11 10:22:20 | Bug report on Solaris 8/x86 |
Previous Message | Adam Witney | 2004-08-11 08:04:46 | Re: OSX problem with make check... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-08-11 09:15:31 | Re: Missing French backend translations in the HEAD |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2004-08-11 07:56:50 | will PITR in 8.0 be usable for "hot spare"/"log shipping" type of replication |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-08-11 09:27:47 | Re: Translation updates: pg_ctl-ru.po.gz |
Previous Message | Gary Doades | 2004-08-11 08:42:13 | Re: PITR on Win32 - Archive and Restore |