From: | momjian(at)svr1(dot)postgresql(dot)org (Bruce Momjian) |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | pgsql-server: Update DELETE FROM: < * Allow DELETE to handle table |
Date: | 2004-08-10 17:30:48 |
Message-ID: | 20040810173048.16CCE14B2866@svr1.postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Log Message:
-----------
Update DELETE FROM:
< * Allow DELETE to handle table aliases for self-joins
> * Allow an alias to be provided for the target table in UPDATE/DELETE
276,279c276,282
< There is no way to create a table alias for the deleted table for use
< in the DELETE WHERE clause. The agreed approach is to allow a USING
< clause to specify additional tables. UPDATE already has an optional
< FROM clause for this purpose.
> This is not SQL-spec but many DBMSs allow it.
>
> * Allow additional tables to be specified in DELETE for joins
>
> UPDATE already allows this (UPDATE...FROM) but we need similar
> functionality in DELETE. It's been agreed that the keyword should
> be USING, to avoid anything as confusing as DELETE FROM a FROM b.
Modified Files:
--------------
pgsql-server/doc:
TODO (r1.1325 -> r1.1326)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql-server/doc/TODO.diff?r1=1.1325&r2=1.1326)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-08-10 18:32:25 | pgsql-server: Translation update |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-08-10 16:29:45 | pgsql-server: Update DELETE FROM TODO info. |