Re: Postgres development model (was Re: CVS comment)

From: James William Pye <flaw(at)rhid(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres development model (was Re: CVS comment)
Date: 2004-08-09 17:48:50
Message-ID: 20040809174850.GB18051@void.ph.cox.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 08/09/04:32/1, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> BitKeeper ist not open source, so it's out of the question for most
> people. Subversion is shockingly unstable. I'm very open for
> something that replaces CVS, but I'd rather not use any than one of
> these two.

From my casual usage of svn, I haven't noticed any stability issues. If it
were shockingly unstable, I would have expected to have had problems with
it.

Using the ssh tunnel, served on an fbsd jail(yeah, rented from Marc), and
connecting with svn client 1.0.4 on my home fbsd 4.10 box..

--
Regards,
James William Pye

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-08-09 17:57:52 Re: Beta Leader?
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2004-08-09 17:44:59 Re: VACUUM DELAY