Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?
Date: 2004-08-09 16:42:41
Message-ID: 200408090942.41481.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches

Tom,

> It might be worth absolut-izing this path in initdb before it's
> passed down, but I can't get exceedingly excited about it.

Well, once again let me check the docs to make sure people are warned about
this ....

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-08-09 16:49:23 Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?
Previous Message Sube Singh 2004-08-09 16:00:27 Installation of PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-08-09 16:49:23 Re: 8.0: Absolute path required for INITDB?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-09 16:27:30 Re: PITR on Win32 - Archive and Restore