Re: Trying to use GIST indexes again

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Trying to use GIST indexes again
Date: 2004-08-06 18:55:50
Message-ID: 20040806185550.GH5167@dcc.uchile.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 11:05:28AM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:

> test=> create index cache_i_gist_sl on cache using gist (r_id, sl_ids);
> ERROR: index row requires 8216 bytes, maximum size is 8191
>
> Postgres 7.4.2
> I have btree_gist and intarray loaded.
> r_id is an integer, sl_ids is an int[].
>
> Does it simply mean one of the int arrays is too large? Most of them have 0,
> 1, or 2, but there are the occasional entries with up to 2,141 elements.

Yes. Probably you could work around that by using a larger BLCKSZ ...

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
One man's impedance mismatch is another man's layer of abstraction.
(Lincoln Yeoh)

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Eckermann 2004-08-06 19:40:04 Re: Postgres and Tools Intro?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2004-08-06 18:32:20 Re: Commit Transaction Command