From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate |
Date: | 2004-07-31 22:34:47 |
Message-ID: | 20040731223447.GA5080@dcc.uchile.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 12:02:47AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > We've also never had a single release before that had its version
> > > number jump determined by the number of features.
> >
> > That's a non-argument, Peter; we don't have any clear criteria for
> > version number jump.
>
> Oh yes, we have very clear criteria: For patch releases, we increase the
> third number, for feature releases we increase the second number and
> set the third number to zero. Clear enough?
What was the rule for increasing the first number after just before 7.0?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>)
"Vivir y dejar de vivir son soluciones imaginarias.
La existencia está en otra parte" (Andre Breton)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-07-31 22:43:32 | Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-07-31 22:25:20 | Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate |