From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
Cc: | David Parker <dparker(at)tazznetworks(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 7.5 beta? |
Date: | 2004-07-26 19:57:19 |
Message-ID: | 20040726165608.T68882@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> David Parker wrote:
>
>> Hi. I understand from lurking on Hackers that 7.5 is nearing beta. What
>> is the typical timeframe for a postgres beta? It's understood, of
>> course, that beta might take longer depending on problems that show up,
>> but I'm wondering if there is an average.
>>
> Someone else might give a more accurate answer based on the actual dates from
> our last few releases, but my guess is at lease 3 months from the beginning
> of beta.
This seems to be about average ... I can't see release before end of
September, earliest, with the amount of stuff we have in this release ...
*but* ... considering that a large portion of it was 'reviewed and
debugged' over the past month, hopefully the # of bugs is a bit less then
past betas ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Crawford | 2004-07-26 20:22:55 | vacuumdb hanging database cluster |
Previous Message | Jerry LeVan | 2004-07-26 19:54:13 | [ANN]: BiggerSQL-1.3 released |