From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Suresh Tri <trisuresh(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)in>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Improvements to PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2004-07-26 07:27:41 |
Message-ID: | 200407260927.41585.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Suresh Tri wrote:
> 2. Core functionality add-ons to postgresql :-
> -Table joins
Already done.
> -Java stored procedures
Already done.
> -Backup and recovery (incremental backup/restore)
Will appear in next release.
> -Query optimization
> * Indexing techniques
> * Star query optimization
Good luck with that. :-)
> - Data Types
> * BLBL
> * Images
> * Long
These are probably redundant with bytea.
> 3. Application compatibility
> -Oracle Compatible JDBC driver
JDBC drivers should be compatible with the JDBC standard, not with some
vendor.
> -Query compatibility
> * Oracle DML/DDL Compatibility
Like what?
> * Behavioral differences like null handling
Not gonna happen.
> * Nested Queries
Do you mean recursive queries?
> * Manual Optimization Hints
These are probably not going to be compatible with Oracle anyway.
> All your sugestions are welcome. Please help us to
> implement these features.
> Our aim is to make postgresql enterprise level.
PostgreSQL is already enterprise-level.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Suresh Tri | 2004-07-26 07:28:49 | Stored procedures - Oracle vs postgresql |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-07-26 07:27:14 | Re: CVS web interface error |