From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Sketch of extending error handling for subtransactions |
Date: | 2004-07-25 01:20:43 |
Message-ID: | 200407250120.i6P1KhQ08278@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Yes. This is an integral part of finishing nested transactions.
>
> > Oh, is this exceptions in functions or the ability to allow functions to
> > keep executing after an SQL error?
>
> Those are the same thing, aren't they? But yes, that's the point here.
So it allows functions to use subtransactions and recover from errors.
I thought that was more than we could do for 7.5 and in fact the release
notes now saw that will be done in a future release.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2004-07-25 01:45:51 | Re: Sketch of extending error handling for subtransactions in functions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-07-25 01:18:55 | Re: Sketch of extending error handling for subtransactions in functions |