| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: patch for allowing multiple -t options to pg_dump |
| Date: | 2004-07-23 18:45:36 |
| Message-ID: | 200407231845.i6NIjat11210@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
His patch has multiple -t options and -T.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Tuesday 20 July 2004 05:54, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Looks like someone else also just submitted the same patch, except with
> > a -T option to exclude tables. I will consider that version instead.
>
> I can certainly see how that -T option is valuable, but I think multiple -t
> options also make sense if you just want to dump 2 or 3 tables in a database
> containing lots of tables. Why not include both?
>
> --
> Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no>
> Senior Software Developer / Manager
> gpg public_key: http://dev.officenet.no/~andreak/public_key.asc
> ------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
> OfficeNet AS | - a tool should do one job, and do it well. |
> Hoffsveien 17 | |
> PO. Box 425 Sk?yen | |
> 0213 Oslo | |
> NORWAY | |
> Phone : +47 22 13 01 00 | |
> Direct: +47 22 13 10 03 | |
> Mobile: +47 909 56 963 | |
> ------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
-- End of PGP section, PGP failed!
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2004-07-23 18:51:46 | Re: [HACKERS] Tutorial |
| Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2004-07-23 18:12:09 | Re: [HACKERS] Wrong index choosen? |