From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_config |
Date: | 2004-07-20 16:25:38 |
Message-ID: | 200407201825.38126.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> To that extent is it not broken by relocated installations that we
> have now made some provision for?
Well, then it should be fixed to take relocated installations into
account.
Relocatable installations are by nature a pretty broken feature. When
you use pg_config to locate, say, libpq, then compile your third-party
package, and then move libpq somewhere else, nothing can save you
(except moving libpq back). At least on Unix, relocatable
installations are a walking cane when you need parallel installations
for upgrades, but they'll never work reliably in general.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Klaus Naumann | 2004-07-20 16:29:30 | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
Previous Message | Steve Atkins | 2004-07-20 16:25:28 | Re: localhost redux |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Klaus Naumann | 2004-07-20 16:29:30 | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
Previous Message | markw | 2004-07-20 15:36:27 | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |