Re: Unbearably slow cascading deletes

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: andrew(at)pillette(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unbearably slow cascading deletes
Date: 2004-07-20 19:45:10
Message-ID: 20040720123547.J31189@megazone.bigpanda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 andrew(at)pillette(dot)com wrote:

> I have (among other things) a parent table with 200 records and a child
> table with 20MM or more. I set up referential integrity on the FK with
> ON DELETE CASCADE.
>
> It appears that when a DELETE is done on the parent table, the child
> table deletion is done with a sequential scan. I say this because it
> took over four minutes to delete a parent record THAT HAD NO CHILDREN.
> The DB is recently analyzed and SELECTs in the child table are done by
> the appropriate index on the FK.
>
> Let me guess, the cascade trigger's query plan is decided at schema load
> time, when the optimizer has no clue. Is there a way to fix this without
> writing my own triggers, using PL/PGSQL EXECUTE to delay the planner?

The query plan should be decided at the first cascaded delete for the key
in the session. However, IIRC, it's using $arguments for the key values,
so it's possible that that is giving it a different plan than it would get
if the value were known. What do you get if you prepare the query with an
argument for the key and use explain execute?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2004-07-20 19:55:14 Re: Unbearably slow cascading deletes
Previous Message andrew 2004-07-20 19:19:11 Unbearably slow cascading deletes