From: | Chuck Bearden <cbearden(at)hal-pc(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Horology & stats tests fail in 7.4.3/RH 9 |
Date: | 2004-07-20 02:30:19 |
Message-ID: | 20040720023019.GA26074@hal-pc.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 12:33:40AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Chuck Bearden <cbearden(at)hal-pc(dot)org> writes:
> > I am building from a freshly downloaded tar.gz of 7.4.3. The machine is
> > a 4CPU Dell with an unsupported RH 9 install.
>
> > When I ran the regression tests, two failed: horology and stats. I'll
> > append the content of the regression.diffs file to the posting.
>
> > Is this something I should be worried about?
>
> Your horology results appear to match the no-DST-before-1970 variant,
> which would be unsurprising on some variants of Unix but it is a tad
> surprising on a recent Linux platform. Still, unless you are planning
> to do stuff with pre-1970 timestamps it's not worth getting excited
> about.
It doesn't sound like something I need to worry about for this project.
> The stats failure shows that the statistics collector is not starting.
> The only cause of that I've seen in the past is broken or overly
> restrictive configuration of local-loopback IP connections. Look in the
> postmaster's log for more details.
That makes sense. I need to review the iptables rules--they weren't my
creation, and I'm not sure the guy who set them up opened up traffic on
lo completely. As I said, I don't have root unless I'm practically
sitting in the admin's lap.
Thanks very much for your responses. They were quite helpful.
Chuck
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michal =?iso-8859-2?q?Maru=B9ka?= | 2004-07-20 06:38:11 | Re: PQftable insufficient for primary key determination |
Previous Message | Jean-Christian Imbeault | 2004-07-20 00:37:22 | Postgres vs Sybase ASE |