| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Vacuum Cost Documentation? |
| Date: | 2004-07-18 00:55:38 |
| Message-ID: | 200407180055.i6I0tc304054@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> Related to autovacuum work, I was looking into the new vacuum delay
> functionality. I might be missing something, but I can't find anything
> on it in the developer docs. Is that right?
>
> Also, in the default postgresql.conf there is:
>
> #vacuum_cost_naptime = 50 # 0-1000 milliseconds
>
> however psql reports this value as 0. I assume this is just
> postgresql.conf is just wrong. Can we fix this so it's consistent?
I am not really fond of the term 'naptime'. Delay? Sleep?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-07-18 03:04:25 | Re: NT + deadlock intended behaviour ? |
| Previous Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2004-07-18 00:06:53 | Vacuum Cost Documentation? |