Re: Vacuum Cost Documentation?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum Cost Documentation?
Date: 2004-07-18 00:55:38
Message-ID: 200407180055.i6I0tc304054@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> Related to autovacuum work, I was looking into the new vacuum delay
> functionality. I might be missing something, but I can't find anything
> on it in the developer docs. Is that right?
>
> Also, in the default postgresql.conf there is:
>
> #vacuum_cost_naptime = 50 # 0-1000 milliseconds
>
> however psql reports this value as 0. I assume this is just
> postgresql.conf is just wrong. Can we fix this so it's consistent?

I am not really fond of the term 'naptime'. Delay? Sleep?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2004-07-18 03:04:25 Re: NT + deadlock intended behaviour ?
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2004-07-18 00:06:53 Vacuum Cost Documentation?