From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Hervé Piedvache <footcow(at)noos(dot)fr>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Hervé Piedvache <herve(at)elma(dot)fr> |
Subject: | Re: Insert are going slower ... |
Date: | 2004-07-14 16:28:29 |
Message-ID: | 200407140928.29498.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Herve'
I forgot to ask about your hardware. How much RAM, and what's your disk
setup? CPU?
> sort_mem = 512000
Huh? Sort_mem is in K. The above says that you've allocated 512MB sort
mem. Is this process the *only* thing going on on the machine?
> vacuum_mem = 409600
Again, 409.6MB vacuum mem? That's an odd number, and quite high.
> max_fsm_pages = 50000000
50million? That's quite high. Certianly enough to have an effect on your
memory usage. How did you calculate this number?
> checkpoint_segments = 3
You should probably increase this if you have the disk space. For massive
insert operations, I've found it useful to have as much as 128 segments
(although this means about 1.5GB disk space)
> effective_cache_size = 5000000
If you actually have that much RAM, I'd love to play on your box. Please?
> Off the top of my head, you have allocated roughly 48K shard buffers which
> seems bit on higher side. Can you check with something like 10K-15K?
Shridhar, that depends on how much RAM he has. On 4GB dedicated machines,
I've set Shared_Buffers as high as 750MB.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hervé Piedvache | 2004-07-14 21:19:16 | Re: Insert are going slower ... |
Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2004-07-14 14:32:47 | Re: Insert are going slower ... |